| Dates |
Actual Protists per Slide |
Predicted Protists per Slide |
|
|
|
|
| 10/1/2007 |
14 |
14 |
|
| 10/3/2007 |
11 |
25 |
|
| 10/8/2007 |
4 |
26 |
|
| 10/15/2007 |
20 |
23 |
|
| 10/17/2007 |
46 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Answer
the following questions directly on this spreadsheet: |
|
| 1. Compare the appearance of your two graphs -
did they follow roughly the same pattern; were the patterns different? |
| How
do these graphs describe the protist populations changing? |
|
|
| 2. Assuming your results are accurate, what
biological factors might have influenced the protist populations? |
|
| 3. Explain all possible sources of error in
your data - what kinds of mistakes might you have made? |
|
| What kinds
of errors might have resulted because of the methods we used? |
|
| What sorts
of external conditions might have given us inaccurate results? |
|
|
| 4. In comparing your raw data (from your
datasheets) how have the populations of small, medium, and large |
|
| protists
changed over time? Have any groups
become more abundant? Have any groups
become less abundant? |
| Explain how
your data illustrates ecological succession. |
|
|
| Example
Responses: |
|
| 1. The "predicted" graph shows a
gradual increase in the protist population follow by a steep decline towards
the end. |
| The
actual graph shows a decline in population for … |
|
|
|
| 2. In the beginning, food might have been
scarce for the protists. Then, they …. |
|
|
|
| 3. One day, I accidentally dropped some soap
into the slide which might have … |
|
|
|
| 4. The "small" protists became much
more abundant … |
|
|
| E-mail
(as an attachment) to dan.bregar@corvallis.k12.or.us with the subject
"per x your name protist graph" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|